The Almost Daily 2¢ - Twin Peaks!
Subtitle: Charade Finally Over?So, here is how the story goes…
America spends the better part of 20 years in an unprecedented speculative frenzy… dot-com boom, housing boom, consumption boom, commercial real estate boom, finance boom, government boom… anything that was levered to credit and financial engineering and had an unrealistic speculative story BOOMED!
Then, as all great manias do, the party abruptly ended leaving “greater fools” strewn about every market and every corner of the economy from housing, autos and retail to banking and finance, commercial real estate, manufacturing, technology, energy and materials… on and on wreaking havoc from Wall Street to Main Street and state, local and federal government.
The cat was fully out of the bag… the mania was now obvious and over and the long deserved bust was firmly in place with broad stock markets selling off 40-55%.
But then… in just six short weeks…
“it’s a turn-around!” say the bulls on Wall Street… “The bottom is in!” … “Buy Buy Buy!” say the charlatans and cheerleaders.
The same folks who couldn’t perceive the decline in the first place were now calling the bottom and Americans, including retail and institutional investors as well as outright speculators, gamblers and other nitwits, were listening.
“The retail investor is back!” stated one enthusiastic floor trader on CNBC.
After the largest credit boom and bust in the post-Great Depression era, a 17 month long -55% deep bear market was all that was needed to put things right again… or so it seemed to the unwitting.
Nope.
That’s not the “real” story.
It appears that this unrealistic era will fade from our collective consciousness very slowly and painfully.
Make no mistake… we are in the midst of a generational decline.
A long unwind of massive debt and delusion that even the federal government cannot prevent.
2009 will be a year of somber awakening to the harsh reality that our economic troubles are more complex and intractable than is now expected.
In fact, recent trends in the job market (the continued jobless claims series specifically) clearly indicate that this economic decline is putting our primarily services-based economy to its first major test.
As the declining economic circumstances continues to drag on, a large and growing population of highly specialized service workers, particularly college educated professional business service workers, are finding out that their labor is either much less valuable or simply no longer needed.
This leaves our economic model in a bit of a predicament.
How do these workers retrain in order to become productive again… change careers… go back to college?
While many pundits still believe that a significant component of the decline to date is attributable to sentiment and psychology, it’s clear now that something truly fundamental is afoot.
Our prior bubble-laden speculative economy didn’t only bring over-consumption… the over-consumption resulted in an over-production of specialized labor skills particularly in the business services sector.
This fundamental unwind is resulting and will continue to result in serious economy-wide vicious cycle effects for the foreseeable future.
As regular readers know, I have been following along the stock market decline for well over a year now with this recurring “Twin Peaks” post whereby I simply charted some very basic technical analytics (somewhat ala the amazing Louise Yamada mixed with a couple of my own inventions) which compared the underlying average movement of the current S&P/500 index to its performance during the unwind of the “dot-com” collapse.
Be sure to study the charts well as they present several different ways of capturing market volatility and together compare past market performance to what we are seeing today.
I will continue to post the comparison to the “dot-com” era bear market for posterity but now that we have broken well through the 2002 lows all technical similarities going forward have ceased… we are firmly in uncharted territory as the two bust eras have now become one.
The “Percentage Up-Down” chart clearly shows that we have just entered a period of REAL volatility BUT also leads one to believe that we may have a long way to go in this market shakeout.
The “Up-Down Daily Closings” chart seems to indicate that although we have seen increased volatility and significant declines, we have yet to match the distribution of daily up closings and down closings (inverted red line).
Study the following image (click for very large and clear version) of the S&P 500 index from 1995 to today then read below for the technical blow by blow.


What follows below is now just maintained for old times’ sake… the second peak was obviously real and this series of posts identified it roughly a year ahead of time.Now that we have entered effectively into uncharted territory, we are at a loss for historical comparison.
THEN (1998 – 2000 Top)
- A. October 1998 – S&P 500 gives early warning sign by crossing its 400 day simple moving average (SMA). Notice also that the 50 day SMA breached the 200 day SMA.
- B. October 1999 – S&P 500 gives a second signal by crossing its 200 day SMA after a solid twelve month expansion. 50 day SMA touches the 200 day SMA.
- C. Three prominent but decelerating peaks set up the top.
- D. Between second and third (last) peak S&P 500 index breaches 200 day SMA. After the final peak S&P 500 index breaches the 400 day SMA.
- E. 50 day SMA heads down fast and crosses the 200 day SMA. (Cross of Death)
- F. 50 day SMA crosses 400 day SMA. (Cross of Far More Death)
- G. 200 day SMA crosses 400 day SMA. (Cross of Fiery Gruesome Death)
NOW (Today’s Top)
- A. June 2006 – S&P 500 gives early warning sign by crossing its 400 day SMA. Notice also that the 50 day SMA breached the 200 day SMA.
- B. March 2007 – S&P 500 gives a second signal by falling near its 200 day SMA after a solid nine month expansion. 50 day SMA similarly depressed.
- C. Three prominent but decelerating peaks set up the top.
- D. Between second and third (last) peak S&P 500 index breaches 200 day SMA. After the final peak S&P 500 index breaches the 400 day SMA.
- E. 50 day SMA heads down fast and crosses the 200 day SMA. (Cross of Death)
- F. 50 day SMA crosses 400 day SMA. (Cross of Far More Death)
- G. 200 day SMA crosses 400 day SMA. (Cross of Fiery Gruesome Death)
- H. Down Down we GO! (Uncharted Death)
- I. Bh Bye! (Fodder for the Sucker-Grinder)
Labels: economic meltdown, economy crisis, economy recession, housing bubble, stock market crash
Copyright © 2013
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer



16 Comments:
This last rally felt a little artificial, almost manufactured. Like everyone knew it was smoke 'n mirror. A mini bubble. I guess it's probably gonna be a bad week or two for the little guy.
And then another PT Barnum rally? There's an investor born every minute.
By
Dagger, at 11:54 AM
Dagger... that's a good one.
Its funny... When Citigroup was under $2 I had more than one (retail investor) acquaintance email me telling me they were going to buy shares... these people are just the typical person with an ETrade or Fidelity account... I think people have lost their marbles in America.
They speculate at the drop of a hat... regular people are looking for a quick buck at every turn... even though they don't know a thing about Citigroup or the depth and breadth of the credit debacle and housing bust they are still ready to make a trade.
To me this is just LOTTO.
They are gambling and what I can discern is not so much educated risk taking as it is desperation.
People have lots of debt and depreciating assets... I think they are subconsciously seeking the "feel good" sense of putting whatever money (401K, IRA) they do have to work.. but now its just starting to look a little ridiculous.
All the world is a "Warren Buffet"... I guess that's the ideal yet... Warren Buffet isn't even Warren Buffet now.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 12:19 PM
SATT - out of curiosity, do you follow the Eliott Wave/ Kondrateff Wave theory on investing?
By
Anonymous, at 12:39 PM
Anon,
I have read a bit about the long cycles and Kondratieff and I have no doubt that these effects are taking place... possibly they are the primary drivers... but the timing to me seems a bit sketchy... I have a book published in the late 60s called "Kondratieff" and it was interesting in that it was in part written in a tone of a chronicle of the 70s and 80s (the future at the time of the writing) and in some ways it nailed those eras but on the other hand it was calling for a serious "depression"-like decline in the 80s and 90s and its not what happened.
So I think that we could learn a LOT from studying the effects of long cycles (population, credit, consumer/speculative behavior, political, etc.) but I'm not so sure you can bank on this very predictable 80+ year cycle... I'm no expert though and I'm inclined to defer to cyclical patterns.
It seems to me we have yet to fully acknowledge how similar the current crisis is to past episodes and how long trending cycles contribute to building these fundamental crescendos.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 1:04 PM
In a few years China will be selling US and EU decent electric cars for <$10k (not great but good enough to get around for folks who care about $$ spent on gas)
That will be the start of the end of western industry....or at least a world where western workers earn many multiples of what asia workers do...
That will be game over !!!
At that point the only way to live comfortable will be on the back of fellow citizens.....(as oppposed to the past where performing a productive task got you a lifestyle...)(What good is a skill if someone in asia can /will do it for 10 cents on the dollar)
By
Anonymous, at 4:11 PM
This blog is excellent. I hope there are more readers than one would gather from the comment section activity.
By
James, at 1:40 AM
James,
Thanks for the good words...
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 10:17 AM
Nice commentary in the original blog post SATT. One of your best in quite some time.
It seems to me we have yet to fully acknowledge how similar the current crisis is to past episodes and how long trending cycles contribute to building these fundamental crescendos.I completely agree. I need to talk to my pops, he's 80 and retired, but as a CPA and someone with a lot of investments and lots of money in the market, he's lost a lot on stocks which he shouldn't have been in at his age. I divested most of the stock holdings in my 401k right after the Freddie/Fanny takeover, that has protected a large part of my retirement portfolio. I've got to convince my pops that even though he's lost a lot, GET OUT NOW before you lose it all!!!! I see no reason to expect an upturn for years and years.
However, I don't see this as a massive catastrophe (though I may change my mind if I lose my job and my home). I see this more as a "correction" back to normal.
By
Phil, at 11:53 AM
Phil,
Thanks for the good words and sorry to hear your grandfather took a hit..
It seems hes not alone... lots of people appear to have shirked old "rule of thumb" policies like not being in stocks after retirement...
I have met several seniors that have lost serious dough in the downturn and I have to say... it's humbling.
How could people who came through so many economic cycles not see the folly in being too comfortable with financial risk taking?
They all report that their friends have lost big too... How could people who were children in the 30s be so caught by this decline?
Simple standard rules of thumb would have had them, merely by their age, in effectively risk-free investments... having lived in the 30s should have had them aware of being too comfortable with financial risk-taking... how did they miss it?
It could be that savers have been so penalized for so many years that they had no choice... that would be sad.. or possibly age and experience is not a guarantee against animal spirits...
In any event it appears that they didnt contemplate hard enough what those dollars were worth to them.
You might say now a dollar is worth a dollar... but what is the replacement cost on that dollar when you are in your 80s?
I think a fair amount higher.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 1:13 PM
You are missing the rest of the letters in the alphabet on your charts.
By
Anonymous, at 2:53 PM
Funny how many bought into that little "rally"
Glad we got THAT over with and can get back to reality... oh wait, I forgot what sort of world we're living in these days.
I admire the optimism of those who say the market is finally regaining its sanity but sadly it is dosed on LSD.
Jr
By
Jr Accountant, at 5:50 PM
It seems hes not alone... lots of people appear to have shirked old "rule of thumb" policies like not being in stocks after retirement...
I have met several seniors that have lost serious dough in the downturn and I have to say... it's humbling.Yeah, my pops should have known better. I talked to him in Feb about my decision to ditch most of the stocks in my 401k right after the Freddie/Fanny debacle and he thought I was very wise to do so - he wished he had done so.
But what about the money these people still DO have in stocks? If you had 500K for retirement and now you have 300K why do people now feel completely locked into the stock market still?
I don't know much about the market but I knew enough to get out when I did. GET OUT NOW! Hell, money markets are now de facto insured better than FDIC!!!
People are NOT understanding what is happening. It is taking a long time for it to sink in.
I bought my house in 2002 with 20% down and I expect to be underwater before all is said and done, but not by too much. I'm hoping to just hold on, as I bought my house planning on retiring in it.
I predict 3500 as the DOW bottom.
By
Phil, at 6:04 PM
BTW did you see the 60 Minutes report on people losing their retirement savings in their 401ks? I was SHOCKED at how little these people had saved. You had $150K at 50 and expected to retire? Seriously?????
By
Phil, at 6:05 PM
JR,
Yea looks like the bulls are buying the turnaround story hook line and sinker...
Its almost reflexive like so long as things dont look completely dire then of course you should b buying stocks.. I think they are missing the point of the decline... the extent of it.
With their "buy" trades they are simply assuming that things will go back to normal yet no one really knows what normal is.
Phil,
I didn't see the 60 mins piece... Ill take a look sounds like my type of segment.
The market seems to me to have a lot of latent optimism or optimism momentum... as if the memory of all the rally years is just overwhelming the more recent memory of the bear market... so there seems to be this continuous disbelief that the decline is major.
At any moment the bulls are ready to run.
So I think this means that the decline has to beat the optimism out of everyone.
In order to get real capitulation I think you need a period where there is really no faith in the markets at all.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 7:11 PM
Bulls are buying the story and little bears are getting short squeezed. Actually most of this rally is short covering and IMO the market makers rebalancing their books. I highly doubt most investors are in this rally and most people cannot possibly time the markets. You guys are just bitter you didn't buy at the bottom. Bottom line, I think we can retest the bottom, but maybe not. Time will tell but coming up with the future result from using past history does not 100% work in the market. Technical Analysis works to some extend but its no predictor of the future movement and I can show you countless examples of that. Still historically speaking market sentiment is weak.
http://www.market-harmonics.com/images/tech/sentiment/ii4.gif
The 3500 (last time the Dow was at this point was 1993) Dow Prediction is a pie in the sky, no one really knows where the true bottom will be it all depends what happens to the global economy and there are too many variables that are uncertain.
By
Anonymous, at 6:02 PM
BTW did you see the 60 Minutes report on people losing their retirement savings in their 401ks? I was SHOCKED at how little these people had saved. You had $150K at 50 and expected to retire? Seriously?????Sure you could retire on much less if you want to. You dump your real estate, move somewhere where the cost of living is low, get on some boards and you are all set or you build a retiree cave behind your kids house and live for free.
By
Anonymous, at 6:05 PM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home